VUN has an MER of 0.16% compared to VFV at 0.07%. Both are small, and the difference comes out to around $9 annually for a $10,000 portfolio. Still, VUN is more than twice as expensive as VFV, which can make a difference when held for the long term. VUN vs. VFV: Holdings. VUN track the CRSP US Total Market Index. I've decided to go with VFV instead of VOO. the MER (management expense ratio) on VOO is 0.03%, but on the VFV it's 0.08%, a difference of 0.05%. The MER is higher with VFV, that's not going to be a problem. Since with VOO even though the MER is lower, i will also be paying 1.25-1.75%, (TD's foreign exchange fees). Now what's better? The biggest difference between VOO and VTI is that VTI includes small-, mid-, and large-cap stocks, while VOO is only large-cap stocks. However, VTI has historically outperformed VOO over the long term due to its inclusion of these small and mid-cap stocks, which give it even broader exposure to the market. While SPY and VOO both track the returns of the S&P 500, there are some key differences between these two funds. Structure. The main difference between SPY and VOO is how the two funds are structured. VOO is an ETF managed by Vanguard, known for its passive index-tracking investment approach. As well due to owning the underlying stocks directly vs. VFV basically being Canada's VOO? They're both essentially the same in terms of being index ETFs tracking the S&P 500. However, there are some key differences and I'm wondering if it would be better to pick one over the other. Any advice would be much appreciated! Thank you! Edit: Formatting The main difference between XEQT and VEQT is in allocations, where VEQT offers a materially higher exposure to Canadian equities while XEQT offers higher exposure to developed market equities (excluding North America). Furthermore, XEQT is part of the iShares fund family owned by BlackRock while VEQT is part of the Vanguard Group’s fund family. Since both VFV and VOO are among the best S&P 500 ETFs in Canada, you may be wondering which to choose between the two ETFs. That shouldn’t be the case if you understand their meh differences. In this VFV vs VOO comparison, we’ll take an overview of each of the S&P 500 ETFs to identify their key similarities and differences. Let’s get The table above shows that, since 2013, FXAIX has outperformed VOO in 7 out of 11 years. While the difference in dividend yield is quite small, the difference is larger than the difference in total returns. Between 2015 and 2017, FXAIX had the largest difference in dividend yield with an average outperformance of 0.50%. The main difference between VFV and XIC is that VFV aims to replicate the performance of the S&P 500 while XIC aims to replicate the performance of the S&P/TSX Composite Index. The Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF (VFV) is managed by Vanguard while the iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF (XIC) is managed by BlackRock. I am struggling to understand the difference in price increase since March 2020 for VFV (~C$57 to C$84) vs VOO (~$210 to $340). As I understand VFV hold VOO under the hood, if this is true then why the price increase of VOO percentage wise is higher than VFV price increase in the same time window. Thanks in advance. 0. The main differences between VOO and VFIAX are: Investment structure: VOO is an exchange-traded fund, which means it trades like a stock on an exchange, whereas VFIAX is a mutual fund that is VFV vs VOO: Fees. Both VFV and VOO have lower fees compared to other ETFs – a common feature of Vanguard ETFs. VFV charges an all-in expense, MER, of 0.09%. On the other hand, VOO has a lower MER of 0.03%. Going by expenses alone, VOO provides a more cost-effective S&P fund than VFV. But the MER does not tell the whole story. IVV VFV VOO VSP Why are their returns so different? What should I buy? IVV looks good with 0.04 MER and huge volume. But while checking the performance, I've baffled by how much different these funds are. These funds are roughly holding the same assets. How if VFV making 21% while others are making 1%?Meanwhile VFV has higher % return in the Both VFV and ZSP have an MER of 0.09%, making them tied on this front, while XUS has an MER of 0.10%. For a $10,000 portfolio, either ZSP or VFV will cost you around $9 per year to hold versus $10 0.03. VOO’s expense ratio is 0.03%, among the industry’s lowest. On the other hand, SPY’s expense ratio is 0.09%, over three times that of VOO. Although this difference may seem small, over several years, it can compound and significantly impact an investor’s overall returns. .
  • ygs65evokm.pages.dev/872
  • ygs65evokm.pages.dev/177
  • ygs65evokm.pages.dev/643
  • ygs65evokm.pages.dev/488
  • ygs65evokm.pages.dev/109

    • difference between voo and vfv